Just so I understand:
So taking the steps to remove the remainder of the backlog that keeps me from buckling down on a single solid schedule and in a manner where everyone gets their pieces evenly and in a reasonable time. (And with the safety net of no payment until their work is finished) and where I can stay on top of bills/expenses so that I may do a better job so a backlog pile up doesn’t happen as often as it has even during any emergences is >not< a good idea?
But continuing to proceed when mentioned multiple times I’ve quite literally hit my limit with balancing it all throughout the last several years. Set up a deadline for December, finished what I could within that time, a damn large amount and majority of it actually even while certain people pushing themselves over the others who waited longer and/or paid fairly more which have messed up the queue plenty, while also growing stagnant, still having payments to make, bills to handle, refunds to give, pushing more people into an extended queue is a good idea?
I mentioned there needs to be a reset, a hard reset so I can try again and do a better with the methods and schedule that has worked out fairly okay the last few months now.
– I get complaints if a deadline is extended. (Even if I am finishing work left to right, quality increased or extra art given. Large projects or small ones that go unposted but delivered.)
– I get complaints if I choose to refund. (Even if it was asked for)
There absolutely no way either option will make both sides of that coin happy when it’s taken this long.
My priority is cleaning the remainder of the backlog one way or another, I know down the line when I can manage it I can provide something for those who had to deal with the mess as compensation. I know who the names are and they are listed. And if even SLIGHTLY given another chance from the commissioner that had a poor experience with me, is do a better job overall with delivery time and quality if there even is a next time.



